<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HD and Streaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming</link>
	<description>with commandN.tv's Jeff MacArthur</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deandrea Montoto</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Deandrea Montoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 04:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristyn Hearnen</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristyn Hearnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-448</guid>
		<description>[...] decabled ~ HD and Streaming   Cutting the Cable Cord - &lt;a href="http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming&lt;/a&gt; - http://www.GetShawty.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decabled ~ HD and Streaming   Cutting the Cable Cord - <a href="http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming" rel="nofollow">http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming</a> - <a href="http://www.GetShawty.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.GetShawty.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: decabled ~ Amazon Video on Demand now in HD! &#171; Cutting the Cable Cord</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>decabled ~ Amazon Video on Demand now in HD! &#171; Cutting the Cable Cord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] One of the questions I get all the time from people interested in decabling is whether they&#8217;ll be giving up HD content after having invested in their nice new big-screen TV. The answer is maybe to some degree but less and less as time goes on (e.g. iTunes Store has HD content, along with some other content providers - with the caveat that all streaming HD is not created equal). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the questions I get all the time from people interested in decabling is whether they&#8217;ll be giving up HD content after having invested in their nice new big-screen TV. The answer is maybe to some degree but less and less as time goes on (e.g. iTunes Store has HD content, along with some other content providers - with the caveat that all streaming HD is not created equal). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-154</guid>
		<description>@SteveInTheUK: I just relied on the trusty old TV antenna to get my video fix back in the day.  Only got cable (outside of my parents' house, and even then we went for years without cable) when I moved to Vancouver for grad school.

@Neondog82: I just take HD to mean that the video is encoded at 720 lines of resolution or more - any other definition is fraught with even bigger problems than this one :-) .  Thanks for the links, too - I had seen the Lifehacker article (forgot to post a link here, d'oh!) but the other article is good too.

@sidelobe: Definitely not arguing that bitrate is not important or that we can even consider using uncompressed video in almost any application, so I do agree with your comments.  I have to say in this day and age that anyone that is very into music should be looking beyond MP3s @ 128kbps (although this has become kind of standard through iTunes, that is hopefully changing with the plethora of iTunes Plus content now being released).  I always encode using AAC at 256 kbps.  That said, I wouldn't bother encoding at that high a level if all I ever used to listen to music was the built-in speakers in my iPhone :-) .  Good quick math example, too, showing what the raw data would look like for video.

@anony mouse: Totally agree.  At the very least, all these companies should be publishing details about the quality of their transmissions.

@Joe Dawson: I have heard about this but not tried it.  I'll check out the link - thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SteveInTheUK: I just relied on the trusty old TV antenna to get my video fix back in the day.  Only got cable (outside of my parents&#8217; house, and even then we went for years without cable) when I moved to Vancouver for grad school.</p>
<p>@Neondog82: I just take HD to mean that the video is encoded at 720 lines of resolution or more - any other definition is fraught with even bigger problems than this one <img src='http://decabled.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Thanks for the links, too - I had seen the Lifehacker article (forgot to post a link here, d&#8217;oh!) but the other article is good too.</p>
<p>@sidelobe: Definitely not arguing that bitrate is not important or that we can even consider using uncompressed video in almost any application, so I do agree with your comments.  I have to say in this day and age that anyone that is very into music should be looking beyond MP3s @ 128kbps (although this has become kind of standard through iTunes, that is hopefully changing with the plethora of iTunes Plus content now being released).  I always encode using AAC at 256 kbps.  That said, I wouldn&#8217;t bother encoding at that high a level if all I ever used to listen to music was the built-in speakers in my iPhone <img src='http://decabled.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Good quick math example, too, showing what the raw data would look like for video.</p>
<p>@anony mouse: Totally agree.  At the very least, all these companies should be publishing details about the quality of their transmissions.</p>
<p>@Joe Dawson: I have heard about this but not tried it.  I&#8217;ll check out the link - thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Dawson</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Have you tried the Torrent Episode Downloader (TED) http://www.ted.nu/ yet Jeff?

I know the question about downloading torrents in Canada and legal aspects are still in question.  But it is worth a look... Very nice bit of software that can really allow you to automate your downloading of TV shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried the Torrent Episode Downloader (TED) <a href="http://www.ted.nu/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.nu/</a> yet Jeff?</p>
<p>I know the question about downloading torrents in Canada and legal aspects are still in question.  But it is worth a look&#8230; Very nice bit of software that can really allow you to automate your downloading of TV shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anony mouse</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>anony mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I think the important thing about bitrates is that they can vary by source, and generallly consumers will have no idea. This enables providers to cut corners by squeezing it down to noticably lower-quality video while still calling it HD. Just as there's a standard for the resolutions of HD, there should be corresponding bitrate standards, so consumers can be assured of consistent experience. 

I agree that there are a lot of variables in TV settings, but we're talking about a basic infrastructure thing that should be defined and consistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the important thing about bitrates is that they can vary by source, and generallly consumers will have no idea. This enables providers to cut corners by squeezing it down to noticably lower-quality video while still calling it HD. Just as there&#8217;s a standard for the resolutions of HD, there should be corresponding bitrate standards, so consumers can be assured of consistent experience. </p>
<p>I agree that there are a lot of variables in TV settings, but we&#8217;re talking about a basic infrastructure thing that should be defined and consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidelobe</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>sidelobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-134</guid>
		<description>It really is all about bit rate. The job of a codec is to allow the transmission of the information content of a signal at acceptable resolution at a manageable bit rate. We trade bit rate (bandwidth) for resolution (picture quality).

A good HTDV is able to display a 1920x1080 image 25x per second. That's a 2 megapixel image every 40 milliseconds. Assuming a 16-bit color depth in three colors (I have no idea what the real color depth is), that's 2.4 gigabits per second. A Blu-Ray disc can carry a lot of data, but not that much.

We have no choice but to squeeze the data. That leaves us talking about bit rate.

We went through this with audio. A CD can carry uncompressed music at 1,400kb/s, but we prefer MP3-encoded music at 128kb/s. But it's impractical to carry HDTV uncompressed at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is all about bit rate. The job of a codec is to allow the transmission of the information content of a signal at acceptable resolution at a manageable bit rate. We trade bit rate (bandwidth) for resolution (picture quality).</p>
<p>A good HTDV is able to display a 1920&#215;1080 image 25x per second. That&#8217;s a 2 megapixel image every 40 milliseconds. Assuming a 16-bit color depth in three colors (I have no idea what the real color depth is), that&#8217;s 2.4 gigabits per second. A Blu-Ray disc can carry a lot of data, but not that much.</p>
<p>We have no choice but to squeeze the data. That leaves us talking about bit rate.</p>
<p>We went through this with audio. A CD can carry uncompressed music at 1,400kb/s, but we prefer MP3-encoded music at 128kb/s. But it&#8217;s impractical to carry HDTV uncompressed at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neondog82</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Neondog82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-133</guid>
		<description>@Jeff Awesome write up. I agree with everything you are saying. People are all about more. Therefore if something has a higher bit rate then it must be better than one with a lower bit rate. Who cares if you can't tell the difference right? A lot of people are confused about what HD content is. Correct me if I am wrong but I thought I saw something somewhere that stated OTA HD is not always HD, it depends on the broadcaster and signal quality. 

@SteveintheUK Before the internet I would just borrow movies from everyone kind of like a social library of movie trading. If I missed a show I liked to watch then I would just chalk it up to being SOL.

I use TVersity. I haven't actually used in about 6 months but I used to be pretty active with it streaming to my Dlink DSM-520.  I had set up a windows service that would open happyfish and download all my podcast when the RSS was updated. I guess I just got tired of the problems associated with wireless streaming. I was actually thing about re purposing my regular Xbox to a media center with XBMC. 

A couple of links for you to check out:

http://www.room362.com/archives/265-TiVo-for-the-Economically-Unstimulated.html

http://lifehacker.com/5138423/cut-the-cable-for-good-with-boxee-and-apple-tv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff Awesome write up. I agree with everything you are saying. People are all about more. Therefore if something has a higher bit rate then it must be better than one with a lower bit rate. Who cares if you can&#8217;t tell the difference right? A lot of people are confused about what HD content is. Correct me if I am wrong but I thought I saw something somewhere that stated OTA HD is not always HD, it depends on the broadcaster and signal quality. </p>
<p>@SteveintheUK Before the internet I would just borrow movies from everyone kind of like a social library of movie trading. If I missed a show I liked to watch then I would just chalk it up to being SOL.</p>
<p>I use TVersity. I haven&#8217;t actually used in about 6 months but I used to be pretty active with it streaming to my Dlink DSM-520.  I had set up a windows service that would open happyfish and download all my podcast when the RSS was updated. I guess I just got tired of the problems associated with wireless streaming. I was actually thing about re purposing my regular Xbox to a media center with XBMC. </p>
<p>A couple of links for you to check out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.room362.com/archives/265-TiVo-for-the-Economically-Unstimulated.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.room362.com/archives/265-TiVo-for-the-Economically-Unstimulated.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5138423/cut-the-cable-for-good-with-boxee-and-apple-tv" rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5138423/cut-the-cable-for-good-with-boxee-and-apple-tv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-130</guid>
		<description>@Steve I really wasnt into anything on TV before I had broadband. Then a friend recommended House and I wathed pretty much all of the current season online and things just took off from there. I still watch House today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve I really wasnt into anything on TV before I had broadband. Then a friend recommended House and I wathed pretty much all of the current season online and things just took off from there. I still watch House today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveintheUK</title>
		<link>http://decabled.com/hd-and-streaming/comment-page-1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveintheUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decabled.com/?p=61#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Great post Jeff, I know this probably isn't right place to ask this but I have a quick question to anybody reading this,

What did you do before video was available on the internet, or you got broadband?

I'm just wondering, and thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to answer.

Sorry Jeff, you can have you post back now, Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jeff, I know this probably isn&#8217;t right place to ask this but I have a quick question to anybody reading this,</p>
<p>What did you do before video was available on the internet, or you got broadband?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering, and thanks in advance to anyone who takes the time to answer.</p>
<p>Sorry Jeff, you can have you post back now, Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
